3-(1-Naphthyl)-L-alanine

Background: Insect growth regulators (IGRs) can control insect vector populations by disrupting growth and development in juvenile stages of the vectors. We previously identified and described the curry tree (Murraya koenigii (L.) Spreng) phytochemical leaf extract composition (neplanocin A, 3-(1-naphthyl)-L-alanine, lumiflavine, terezine C, agelaspongin and murrayazolinol), which disrupted growth and development in Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto mosquito larvae by inducing morphogenetic abnormalities, reducing locomotion and delaying pupation in the mosquito. Here, we attempted to establish the transcriptional process in the larvae that underpins these phenotypes in the mosquito. Methods: We first exposed third-fourth instar larvae of the mosquito to the leaf extract and consequently the inherent phytochemicals (and corresponding non-exposed controls) in two independent biological replicates. We collected the larvae for our experiments sampled 24 h before peak pupation, which was 7 and 18 days post-exposure for controls and exposed larvae, respectively. The differences in duration to peak pupation were due to extract-induced growth delay in the larvae. The two study groups (exposed vs control) were consequently not age-matched. We then sequentially (i) isolated RNA (whole larvae) from each replicate treatment, (ii) sequenced the RNA on Illumina HiSeq platform, (iii) performed differential bioinformatics analyses between libraries (exposed vs control) and (iv) independently validated the transcriptome expression profiles through RT-qPCR. Results: Our analyses revealed significant induction of transcripts predominantly associated with hard cuticular proteins, juvenile hormone esterases, immunity and detoxification in the larvae samples exposed to the extract relative to the non-exposed control samples. Our analysis also revealed alteration of pathways functionally associated with putrescine metabolism and structural constituents of the cuticle in the extract-exposed larvae relative to the non-exposed control, putatively linked to the exoskeleton and immune response in the larvae. The extract-exposed larvae also appeared to have suppressed pathways functionally associated with molting, cell division and growth in the larvae. However, given the age mismatch between the extract-exposed and non-exposed larvae, we can attribute the modulation of innate immune, detoxification, cuticular and associated transcripts and pathways we observed to effects of age differences among the larvae samples (exposed vs control) and to exposures of the larvae to the extract. Conclusions: The exposure treatment appears to disrupt cuticular development, immune response and oxidative stress pathways in Anopheles gambiae s.s larvae. These pathways can potentially be targeted in development of more efficacious curry tree phytochemical-based IGRs against An. gambiae s.s mosquito larvae.

Deltorphins I and II (Tyr-D-Ala-Phe-Asp-Val-Val-Gly NH2 and Tyr-D-Ala-Phe-Glu-Val-Val-Gly NH2) display a high degree of delta-opioid receptor selectivity. Since they lack the intervening Gly3 residue found between the Tyr and Phe aromatic moieties in pentapeptide enkephalins, deltorphins I and II resemble a previously described series of cyclic tetrapeptides based on Tyr-c[D-Cys-Phe-D-Pen] (JOM-13). With the goal of development of structure-activity relationships for deltorphins and comparison with that of the cyclic tetrapeptides, ten analogs of deltorphin I were synthesized in which Phe3 was replaced with specific aromatic and nonaromatic amino acids with varying physicochemical properties. Results indicated that analogs containing the bicyclic aromatic amino acids 3-(1-naphthyl)-L-alanine [1-Nal; Ki(mu) = 767 nM, Ki(delta) = 7.70 nM], 3-(2-naphthyl)-L-alanine [2-Nal; Ki(mu) = 1910 nM, Ki(delta) = 49.2 nM], tryptophan [Ki(mu) = 1250 nM, Ki(delta) = 23.9 nM], and 3-(3-benzothienyl)-L-alanine [Bth; Ki(mu) = 112 nM, Ki(delta) = 3.36 nM] were fairly well tolerated at mu- and delta-receptors, though affinity was compromised to varying degrees relative to deltorphin I. Shortening the Phe side chain by incorporation of phenylglycine (Pgl) was detrimental to both mu (Ki = 4710 nM) and delta (Ki = 15.6 nM) binding, while extension of the side chain with homophenylalanine (Hfe) enhanced mu binding (Ki = 67.8 nM), leaving delta affinity unaffected (Ki = 2.64 nM). Substitution with nonaromatic amino acids valine and isoleucine led expectedly to poor opioid binding [Ki(mu) = > or = 10,000 nM for each, Ki(delta) = 160 and 94.7 nM, respectively], while peptides containing cyclohexylalanine (Cha) and leucine surprisingly retained affinity at both mu (Ki = 322 and 1240 nM, respectively) and delta (Ki = 10.5 and 12.4 nM, respectively) sites. In general, these trends mirror those observed for similar modification in Tyr-c[D-Cys-Phe-D-Pen].

Due to their similar coordination properties, discrimination of Cu+ and Ag+ by water-soluble luminescent probes is challenging. We have synthesized LCC4Eu, an 18 amino acid cyclic peptide bearing a europium complex, which is able to bind one Cu+ or Ag+ ion by the side chains of two methionines, a histidine and a 3-(1-naphthyl)-l-alanine. In this system, the naphthyl moiety establishes a cation-π interaction with these cations. It also acts as an antenna for the sensitization of Eu3+ luminescence. Interestingly, when excited at 280 nm, LCC4Eu behaves as a turn-on probe for Ag+ (+150% Eu emission) and as a turn-off probe for Cu+ (-50% Eu3+ emission). Shifting the excitation wavelength to 305 nm makes the probe responsive to Ag+ (+380% Eu3+ emission) but not to Cu+ or other physiological cations. Thus, LCC4Eu is uniquely capable of discriminating Ag+ from Cu+. A detailed spectroscopic characterization based on steady-state and time-resolved measurements clearly demonstrates that Eu3+ sensitization relies on electronic energy transfer from the naphthalene triplet state to the Eu3+ excited states and that the cation-π interaction lowers the energy of this triplet state by 700 and 2400 cm-1 for Ag+ and Cu+, respectively. Spectroscopic data point to a modulation of the efficiency of the electronic energy transfer caused by the differential red shift of the naphthalene triplet, deciphering the differential luminescence response of LCC4Eu toward Ag+ and Cu+.