3,3-Diphenyl-D-alanine
Need Assistance?
  • US & Canada:
    +
  • UK: +

3,3-Diphenyl-D-alanine

* Please kindly note that our products are not to be used for therapeutic purposes and cannot be sold to patients.

3,3-Diphenyl-D-alanine is an unnatural amino acid. It is similar to the two amino acids alanine and phenylalanine. It has been used for the synthesis of pseudopeptide analogues which are capable of inhibiting certain enzymes.

Category
D-Amino Acids
Catalog number
BAT-007814
CAS number
149597-91-1
Molecular Formula
C15H15NO2
Molecular Weight
241.29
3,3-Diphenyl-D-alanine
IUPAC Name
(2R)-2-amino-3,3-diphenylpropanoic acid
Synonyms
D-Ala(3,3-diphenyl)-OH; (R)-2-Amino-3,3-diphenylpropionic acid; D-3,3-Diphenylalanine; beta-Phenyl-D-phenylalanine; D-Phenylalanine, beta-phenyl-; (R)-Diphenylalanine; H-D-Dph-OH; beta,beta-Diphenyl-D-alanine; (2R)-2-amino-3,3-diphenylpropanoic acid
Purity
99%
Density
1.198±0.06 g/cm3 (Predicted)
Boiling Point
389.2±30.0 °C (Predicted)
Storage
Store at 2-8 °C
InChI
InChI=1S/C15H15NO2/c16-14(15(17)18)13(11-7-3-1-4-8-11)12-9-5-2-6-10-12/h1-10,13-14H,16H2,(H,17,18)/t14-/m1/s1
InChI Key
PECGVEGMRUZOML-CQSZACIVSA-N
Canonical SMILES
C1=CC=C(C=C1)C(C2=CC=CC=C2)C(C(=O)O)N
1. Ghrelin receptor inverse agonists: identification of an active peptide core and its interaction epitopes on the receptor
Birgitte Holst, Manja Lang, Erik Brandt, Anders Bach, Andrew Howard, Thomas M Frimurer, Annette Beck-Sickinger, Thue W Schwartz Mol Pharmacol. 2006 Sep;70(3):936-46. doi: 10.1124/mol.106.024422. Epub 2006 Jun 23.
[D-Arg1,D-Phe5,D-Trp7,9,Leu11]Substance P functions as a low-potency antagonist but a high-potency full inverse agonist on the ghrelin receptor. Through a systematic deletion and substitution analysis of this peptide, the C-terminal carboxyamidated pentapeptide wFwLX was identified as the core structure, which itself displayed relatively low inverse agonist potency. Mutational analysis at 17 selected positions in the main ligand-binding crevice of the ghrelin receptor demonstrated that ghrelin apparently interacts only with residues in the middle part of the pocket [i.e., between transmembrane (TM)-III, TM-VI and TM-VII]. In contrast, the inverse agonist peptides bind in a pocket that extends all the way from the extracellular end of TM-II (AspII:20) across between TM-III and TM-VI/VII to TM-V and TM-IV. The potency of the main inverse agonist could be improved up to 20-fold by a number of space-generating mutants located relatively deep in the binding pocket at key positions in TM-III, TM-IV and TM-V. It is proposed that the inverse agonists prevent the spontaneous receptor activation by inserting relatively deeply across the main ligand-binding pocket and sterically blocking the movement of TM-VI and TM-VII into their inward-bend, active conformation. The combined structure-functional analysis of both the ligand and the receptor allowed for the design of a novel, N-terminally Lys-extended analog of wFwLL, which rescued the high-potency, selective inverse agonism that was dependent upon both AspII:20 and GluIII:09. The identified pharmacophore can possibly serve as the basis for targeted discovery of also nonpeptide inverse agonists for the ghrelin receptor.
2. Modulation of the constitutive activity of the ghrelin receptor by use of pharmacological tools and mutagenesis
Jacek Mokrosiński, Birgitte Holst Methods Enzymol. 2010;484:53-73. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-381298-8.00003-4.
Ghrelin and its receptor are important regulators of metabolic functions, including appetite, energy expenditure, fat accumulation, and growth hormone (GH) secretion. The ghrelin receptor is characterized by an ability to signal even without any ligand present with approximately 50% of the maximally ghrelin-induced efficacy-a feature that may have important physiological implications. The high basal signaling can be modulated either by administration of specific ligands or by engineering of mutations in the receptor structure. [D-Arg(1), D-Phe(5), D-Trp(7,9), Leu(11)]-substance P was the first inverse agonist to be identified for the ghrelin receptor, and this peptide has been used as a starting point for identification of the structural requirements for inverse agonist properties in the ligand. The receptor binding core motif was identified as D-Trp-Phe-D-Trp-Leu-Leu, and elongation of this peptide in the amino-terminal end determined the efficacy. Attachment of a positively charged amino acid was responsible for full inverse agonism, whereas an alanin converted the peptide into a partial agonist. Importantly, by use of mutational mapping of the residues critical for the modified D-Trp-Phe-D-Trp-Leu-Leu peptides, it was found that space-generating mutations in the deeper part of the receptor improved inverse agonism, whereas similar mutations located in the more extracellular part improved agonism. Modulation of the basal signaling by mutations in the receptor structure is primarily obtained by substitutions in an aromatic cluster that keep TMs VI and VII in close proximity to TM III and thus stabilize the active conformation. Also, substitution of a Phe in TM V is crucial for the high basal activity of the receptor as this residue serves as a partner for Trp VI:13 in the active conformation. It is suggested that inverse agonist and antagonist against the ghrelin receptor provide an interesting possibility in the development of drugs for treatment of obesity and diabetes and that improved structural understanding of the receptor function facilitates the drug development.
3. C-terminus of a hexapeptidic ghrelin receptor inverse agonist can switch peptide behavior from inverse agonism to agonism
Sylvia Els-Heindl, Kathrin Bellmann-Sickert, Annette G Beck-Sickinger Biopolymers. 2016 Jan;106(1):101-8. doi: 10.1002/bip.22768.
Subtle changes in the sequence at the N-terminus and in the aromatic core of hexapeptidic ghrelin receptor inverse agonists can switch behavior from inverse agonism to agonism, but the C-terminal role of the sequence is unclear. Thus, analogs of the ghrelin receptor inverse agonist KbFwLL-NH2 (b = β-(3-benzothienyl)-d-alanine) were synthesized by solid phase peptide synthesis in order to identify the influence of aromaticity, charge, and hydrophobicity. Potency and efficacy of the hexapeptides were evaluated in inositol triphosphate turnover assays. Notably, modifications directly at the C-terminal Leu(6) could influence peptide efficacy leading to decreased constitutive activity. High hydrophobicity at the C-terminal position was of importance for elevated inverse agonist activity, the introduction of charged amino acids led to decreased potency. In contrast, structure-activity relationship studies of Leu(5) located closer to the aromatic core revealed an agonism-inducing position. These findings imply that amino acids with possible cation-π or π-π interactions and a suitable orientation at the C-terminus of the aromatic core induce agonism. Receptor binding studies showed that most peptides bind to the receptor at a concentration of 1 µM and modification directly at the C-terminus is generally more accepted than Leu(5) substitution. Interestingly, this observation is not dependent on the type of modification. These studies reveal another switch region of the short ghrelin receptor ligand pointing out the sensitivity of the ghrelin receptor binding pocket.
Online Inquiry
Verification code
Inquiry Basket