Amyloid β-Protein (1-24)
Need Assistance?
  • US & Canada:
    +
  • UK: +

Amyloid β-Protein (1-24)

* Please kindly note that our products are not to be used for therapeutic purposes and cannot be sold to patients.

Category
Functional Peptides
Catalog number
BAT-014702
CAS number
138648-77-8
Molecular Formula
C130H183N35O40
Molecular Weight
2876.05
IUPAC Name
(4S)-5-[[(2S)-1-[[(2S)-1-[[(2S)-1-[[(2S)-1-[[(2S)-1-[[2-[[(2S)-1-[[(2S)-1-[[(2S)-1-[[(2S)-1-[[(2S)-1-[[(2S)-5-amino-1-[[(2S)-6-amino-1-[[(2S)-1-[[(2S)-1-[[(2S)-1-[[(2S)-1-[[(2S)-1-[[(2S)-4-carboxy-1-[[(2S)-3-carboxy-1-[[(1S)-1-carboxy-2-methylpropyl]amino]-1-oxopropan-2-yl]amino]-1-oxobutan-2-yl]amino]-1-oxopropan-2-yl]amino]-1-oxo-3-phenylpropan-2-yl]amino]-1-oxo-3-phenylpropan-2-yl]amino]-3-methyl-1-oxobutan-2-yl]amino]-4-methyl-1-oxopentan-2-yl]amino]-1-oxohexan-2-yl]amino]-1,5-dioxopentan-2-yl]amino]-3-(1H-imidazol-5-yl)-1-oxopropan-2-yl]amino]-3-(1H-imidazol-5-yl)-1-oxopropan-2-yl]amino]-3-methyl-1-oxobutan-2-yl]amino]-4-carboxy-1-oxobutan-2-yl]amino]-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-1-oxopropan-2-yl]amino]-2-oxoethyl]amino]-3-hydroxy-1-oxopropan-2-yl]amino]-3-carboxy-1-oxopropan-2-yl]amino]-3-(1H-imidazol-5-yl)-1-oxopropan-2-yl]amino]-5-carbamimidamido-1-oxopentan-2-yl]amino]-1-oxo-3-phenylpropan-2-yl]amino]-4-[[(2S)-2-[[(2S)-2-amino-3-carboxypropanoyl]amino]propanoyl]amino]-5-oxopentanoic acid
Synonyms
β-Amyloid (1-24); H-Asp-Ala-Glu-Phe-Arg-His-Asp-Ser-Gly-Tyr-Glu-Val-His-His-Gln-Lys-Leu-Val-Phe-Phe-Ala-Glu-Asp-Val-OH; L-alpha-aspartyl-L-alanyl-L-alpha-glutamyl-L-phenylalanyl-L-arginyl-L-histidyl-L-alpha-aspartyl-L-seryl-glycyl-L-tyrosyl-L-alpha-glutamyl-L-valyl-L-histidyl-L-histidyl-L-glutaminyl-L-lysyl-L-leucyl-L-valyl-L-phenylalanyl-L-phenylalanyl-L-alanyl-L-alpha-glutamyl-L-alpha-aspartyl-L-valine
Appearance
White Lyophilized Powder
Purity
≥95%
Density
1.5±0.1 g/cm3
Sequence
DAEFRHDSGYEVHHQKLVFFAEDV
Storage
Store at -20°C
Solubility
Soluble in Water
InChI
InChI=1S/C130H183N35O40/c1-64(2)45-85(125(200)164-105(66(5)6)127(202)160-89(48-72-27-18-13-19-28-72)120(195)155-87(46-70-23-14-11-15-24-70)117(192)145-69(10)108(183)148-83(37-41-99(172)173)115(190)158-94(55-103(180)181)126(201)165-106(67(7)8)129(204)205)153-111(186)79(29-20-21-43-131)149-113(188)81(35-39-96(133)168)151-121(196)90(50-74-56-136-61-141-74)157-123(198)92(52-76-58-138-63-143-76)161-128(203)104(65(3)4)163-116(191)84(38-42-100(174)175)152-118(193)86(49-73-31-33-77(167)34-32-73)146-97(169)59-140-110(185)95(60-166)162-124(199)93(54-102(178)179)159-122(197)91(51-75-57-137-62-142-75)156-112(187)80(30-22-44-139-130(134)135)150-119(194)88(47-71-25-16-12-17-26-71)154-114(189)82(36-40-98(170)171)147-107(182)68(9)144-109(184)78(132)53-101(176)177/h11-19,23-28,31-34,56-58,61-69,78-95,104-106,166-167H,20-22,29-30,35-55,59-60,131-132H2,1-10H3,(H2,133,168)(H,136,141)(H,137,142)(H,138,143)(H,140,185)(H,144,184)(H,145,192)(H,146,169)(H,147,182)(H,148,183)(H,149,188)(H,150,194)(H,151,196)(H,152,193)(H,153,186)(H,154,189)(H,155,195)(H,156,187)(H,157,198)(H,158,190)(H,159,197)(H,160,202)(H,161,203)(H,162,199)(H,163,191)(H,164,200)(H,165,201)(H,170,171)(H,172,173)(H,174,175)(H,176,177)(H,178,179)(H,180,181)(H,204,205)(H4,134,135,139)/t68-,69-,78-,79-,80-,81-,82-,83-,84-,85-,86-,87-,88-,89-,90-,91-,92-,93-,94-,95-,104-,105-,106-/m0/s1
InChI Key
QFZAFFOKBFTGCJ-XQNMWOEISA-N
Canonical SMILES
CC(C)CC(C(=O)NC(C(C)C)C(=O)NC(CC1=CC=CC=C1)C(=O)NC(CC2=CC=CC=C2)C(=O)NC(C)C(=O)NC(CCC(=O)O)C(=O)NC(CC(=O)O)C(=O)NC(C(C)C)C(=O)O)NC(=O)C(CCCCN)NC(=O)C(CCC(=O)N)NC(=O)C(CC3=CN=CN3)NC(=O)C(CC4=CN=CN4)NC(=O)C(C(C)C)NC(=O)C(CCC(=O)O)NC(=O)C(CC5=CC=C(C=C5)O)NC(=O)CNC(=O)C(CO)NC(=O)C(CC(=O)O)NC(=O)C(CC6=CN=CN6)NC(=O)C(CCCNC(=N)N)NC(=O)C(CC7=CC=CC=C7)NC(=O)C(CCC(=O)O)NC(=O)C(C)NC(=O)C(CC(=O)O)N
1. Blood biomarkers for the diagnosis of amnestic mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Yi Qu, Ya-Hui Ma, Yu-Yuan Huang, Ya-Nan Ou, Xue-Ning Shen, Shi-Dong Chen, Qiang Dong, Lan Tan, Jin-Tai Yu Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Sep;128:479-486. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.07.007. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
The development of blood-based biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology as tools for screening the general population is essential, but persists controversies. We aimed to evaluate the effects of AD core pathological biomarkers on blood, and systematical searched Embase, PubMed and Cochrane for eligible studies. Biomarker performance was rated by random-effects meta-analysis based on the ratio of means method and multivariable-adjusted effect estimates. Finally, 150 articles were included, which demonstrated T-tau (average ratio: 1.25-1.62), P-tau 181 (1.36-2.16) and NfL (1.24-1.86) were increased, and AβPPr (0.65-0.88) were decreased from controls to amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) to AD. Furthermore, Aβ42, Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio and P-tau 217 using ultrasensitive platforms also had great diagnostic accuracy from controls to aMCI to AD. Consequently, significantly changes of blood AD core biomarkers were verified in comparison between AD, aMCI and control, supporting biomarkers were strongly valid in identifying AD and aMCI, which provides a new prospect of AD early diagnosis and progressive monitoring. This study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42020191927.
2. Recent update on the heterogeneity of the Alzheimer's disease spectrum
Kurt A Jellinger J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2022 Jan;129(1):1-24. doi: 10.1007/s00702-021-02449-2. Epub 2021 Dec 17.
Alzheimer's disease (AD), the most common form of dementia worldwide, is a mixed proteinopathy (β-amyloid, tau and other proteins). Classically defined as a clinicopathological entity, AD is a heterogeneous, multifactorial disorder with various pathobiological subtypes showing different forms of cognitive presentation, currently referred to as the Alzheimer spectrum or continuum. Its morphological hallmarks are extracellular β-amyloid (amyloid plaques) and intraneuronal tau aggregates forming neurofibrillary tangles and neurites, vascular amyloid deposits (cerebral amyloid angiopathy), synapse and neuronal loss as well as neuroinflammation and reactive astrogliosis, leading to cerebral atrophy and progressive mental/cognitive impairment (dementia). In addition to "classical" AD, several subtypes with characteristic regional patterns of tau pathology have been segregated that are characterized by distinct clinical features, differences in age, sex distribution, disease duration, cognitive status, APOE genotype, and biomarker levels. In addition to four major subtypes based on the distribution of tau pathology and brain atrophy (typical, limbic predominant, hippocampal sparing, and minimal atrophy), several other clinical variants (non-amnestic, corticobasal, behavioral/dysexecutive, posterior cortical variants, etc.) have been identified. These heterogeneous AD variants are characterized by different patterns of key neuronal network destructions, in particular the default-mode network that is responsible for cognitive decline. Other frequent age-related co-pathologies, e.g., cerebrovascular lesions, Lewy and TDP-43 pathologies, hippocampal sclerosis, or argyrophilic grain disease, essentially influence the clinical picture and course of AD, and can challenge our understanding of this disorder including the threshold and causal relevance of each individual pathology. Unravelling the clinico-morphological heterogeneity among the AD spectrum entities is important for better elucidation of the pathogenic mechanisms affecting the aging brain that may enable a broader diagnostic coverage of AD as a basis for implementing precision medicine approaches and for developing preventive and ultimately disease-modifying therapies for this devastating disorder.
3. Prospective biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Rui-Xian Li, Ya-Hui Ma, Lan Tan, Jin-Tai Yu Ageing Res Rev. 2022 Nov;81:101699. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2022.101699. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
Objective: Alzheimer's disease (AD) involves a series of pathological changes and some biomarkers were reported to assist in monitoring and predicting disease progression before the emergence of clinical symptoms. We aimed to identify prospective biomarkers and quantify their effect on AD progression. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science databases were searched for prospective cohort studies published up to October 2021. Eligible studies were included, and the available data were extracted. Meta-analyses were conducted based on random-effect models. Relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was adopted as the final effect size. Results: Totally 48,769 articles were identified, of which 84 studies with 20 prospective biomarkers were included in meta-analyses. In the present study, 15 biomarkers were associated with AD progression, comprising CSF Aβ42 (RR=2.49, 95%CI=1.68-3.69), t-tau (RR=1.88, 95%CI=1.49-2.37), p-tau (RR=1.74, 95%CI=1.37-2.21), tau/Aβ42 ratio (RR=5.11, 95%CI=2.01-13.00); peripheral blood Aβ42/Aβ40 (RR=1.26, 95%CI=1.05-1.51), t-tau (RR=1.33, 95%CI=1.08-1.64), NFL (RR=1.75, 95%CI=1.07-2.87); whole, left and right hippocampal volume (HV) (whole: RR=1.65, 95%CI=1.39-1.95; left: RR=2.60, 95%CI=1.02-6.64; right: RR=1.43, 95%CI=1.23-1.66), entorhinal cortex (EC) volume (RR=1.69, 95%CI=1.24-2.30), medial temporal lobe atrophy (MTA) (RR=1.52, 95%CI=1.33-1.74), 18 F-FDG PET (RR=2.24, 95%CI=1.29-3.89), 11 C-labeled Pittsburgh Compound B PET (11 C-PIB PET) (RR=3.91, 95%CI=1.06-14.41); APOE ε4 (RR=2.16, 1.83-2.55). A total of 70 articles were included in the qualitative review, in which 61 biomarkers were additionally associated with AD progression. Conclusion: CSF Aβ42, t-tau, p-tau, tau/Aβ42; peripheral blood t-tau, Aβ42/Aβ40, NFL; whole, left and right HV, EC volume, MTA, 18 F-FDG PET, 11 C-PIB PET; APOE ε4 may be promising prospective biomarkers for AD progression.
Online Inquiry
Verification code
Inquiry Basket