1. Functional characterisation of the putative somatostatin sst2 receptor antagonist CYN 154806
Daniel Langenegger, Caroline Nunn, Daniel Hoyer, Philippe Schoeffter Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol . 2003 Jan;367(1):1-9. doi: 10.1007/s00210-002-0656-5.
The two forms (DTyr8 and LTyr8) of the putative somatostatin sst2 receptor antagonist CYN 154806 (Ac-4NO2-Phe-c(DCys-Tyr-DTrp-Lys-Thr-Cys)-D/LTyr-NH2) were investigated on recombinant human somatostatin receptors and endogenous guinea-pig ileum receptors. In radioligand binding studies using the agonist radioligands [125I]LTT-SRIF-28, [125I][Tyr10]cortistatin-14, [125I]CGP 23996 and [125I][Tyr3]octreotide in Chinese hamster lung fibroblast (CCL39) and Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells expressing human somatostatin receptors (hsst1-5), CYN 154806 binds to sst2 receptors with nanomolar affinity (pKD=8.14-8.89), 40- to 4500-fold higher than for sst1, sst3 or sst4. High affinity was also demonstrated for sst5 receptors, particularly for LTyr8CYN 154806 where the sst5 affinity was higher than for sst2 receptors when using [125I]CGP 23996 and [125I][Tyr3]octreotide. Functional properties of the compounds were examined in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells expressing human sst2 receptors, in (1) inhibition of forskolin-stimulated adenylate cyclase, (2) stimulation of serum response element-driven luciferase expression and (3) [35S]guanosine 5'-O-(3-thiotriphosphate) ([35S]GTPS) binding. L- and DTyr8CYN 154806 showed full agonism at inhibition of forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation (pEC50=7.73 for both, Emax 104% and 78%, respectively), partial agonism at luciferase expression (pEC50=7.85 and 8.16, Emax=50% and 29%, respectively) and behaved as apparently silent antagonists at [35S]GTPS binding (no agonism observed, pKB=6.88 and 7.50, respectively). The agonist potential was confirmed in isolated guinea-pig ileum preparations via measurement of SRIF-induced inhibition of neurotransmission, where the L-isoform had marked agonism (pEC50=8.23, Emax=32%) whereas the D-isoform was apparently devoid of agonism. The present data suggest that CYN 154806 should be used with caution as an sst2 receptor antagonist tool, since it possesses intrinsic activity at sst2, and high affinity for both sst2 and sst5 receptors. The DTyr form, having lower intrinsic activity, especially in natural tissues, and greater selectivity for sst2 receptors, may be more reliable than LTyr CYN 154806.
2. Inhibitory control of growth hormone secretion by somatostatin in rat pituitary GC cells: sst(2) but not sst(1) receptors are coupled to inhibition of single-cell intracellular free calcium concentrations
Cristina Petrucci, Marie Thérèse Bluet-Pajot, Jacques Epelbaum, Paola Bagnoli, Davide Cervia Neuroendocrinology . 2002 Aug;76(2):99-110. doi: 10.1159/000064424.
Rat pituitary tumor cells (GC cells) exhibit spontaneous oscillations of intracellular free calcium concentration ([Ca(2+)](i)) that allow continuous release of growth hormone (GH). Of the somatostatin (SRIH) receptor subtypes (sst receptors) mediating SRIH action, sst(1) and sst(2) receptors are highly expressed by GC cell membranes. In the present study, the effects of sst(1) or sst(2) receptor activation on single-cell [Ca(2+)](i) were investigated in GC cells by confocal fluorescence microscopy. In addition, the effects of sst(1) or sst(2) receptor activation on GH secretion were also studied. Our results demonstrate that SRIH decreases [Ca(2+)](i) baseline and almost completely blocks Ca(2+) transients through activation of sst(2) but not of sst(1) receptors. In contrast, SRIH effectively inhibits GH secretion through activation of both sst(1) and sst(2) receptors. Blocking Ca(2+) transients is less efficient than SRIH to inhibit GH release. The cyclic octapeptide, CYN-154806, antagonizes sst(2) receptors at [Ca(2+)](i) since it abolishes the sst(2) receptor-mediated inhibition of [Ca(2+)](i) without affecting single-cell Ca(2+) signals. On the other hand, CYN-154806 alone potently inhibits GH secretion through the involvement of pertussis toxin-sensitive G proteins. In conclusion, the present results demonstrate that SRIH inhibition of GH release in GC cells involves mechanisms either dependent or independent on SRIH modulation of [Ca(2+)](i). The implications of CYN-154806 inhibition of GH secretion are discussed.
3. Somatostatin receptors in the ventral pallidum/substantia innominata modulate rat locomotor activity
A Kastellakis, A Marazioti, K Antoniou, D Papasava, K Thermos Psychopharmacology (Berl) . 2005 Sep;181(2):319-26. doi: 10.1007/s00213-005-2237-z.
Rationale:Somatostatin and its receptors (sst(1) and sst(2)) have been localized in brain nuclei implicated in motor control, such as the nucleus accumbens, ventral pallidum (VP) and substantia innominata (SI).Objectives:The objective of the study is to investigate the effect of somatostatin and selective sst(1) and sst(2) analogs infused in the VP/SI on the locomotor activity of the rat.Methods:Somatostatin (15, 30, 60, 120 and 240 ng/0.5 microl/side), CH275 (sst(1) analog; 60, 180, 240 and 480 ng/0.5 microl/side), MK678 (sst(2) analog; 120, 240 and 480 ng/0.5 microl/side), L-809,087 (sst(4) agonist, 240 ng/0.5 microl/side) or saline (vehicle) were infused bilaterally in the VP/SI of the rat and locomotor activity measured for 60 min. The effect of SRA-880 (sst(1) antagonist) and CYN-154806 (sst(2) antagonist) on somatostatin-, CH275- and MK678-mediated locomotor activity was also ascertained.Results:Somatostatin decreased locomotor activity in the first 30 min after its infusion in the VP/SI and in a dose-dependent manner. The sst(1) and sst(2) antagonists, SRA-880 and CYN-154806, respectively, reversed the somatostatin effect. The sst(1) and sst(2) agonists CH275 and MK678, respectively, mimicked somatostatin's actions, while the selective sst(4) agonist L-809,087 had no effect. Moreover, SRA-880 and CYN-154806 reversed the respective agonist action on locomotor activity.Conclusion:The present study provides functional evidence for the presence of sst(1) and sst(2) receptors in the VP/SI and their implication in motor control. The mechanism via which somatostatin and agonists mediate the attenuation of locomotor activity is presently being investigated.
