1. Relative hypercoagulation induced by suppressed fibrinolysis after tisagenlecleucel infusion in malignant lymphoma
Makiko Yamasaki-Morita, et al. Blood Adv. 2022 Jul 26;6(14):4216-4223. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022007454.
Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy has facilitated progress in treatment of refractory/relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). A well-known adverse event after CAR-T therapy is cytokine release syndrome(CRS). However, the etiology and pathophysiology of CRS-related coagulopathy remain unknown. Therefore, we conducted a prospective cohort study to comprehensively analyze coagulation/ fibrinolysis parameters present in peripheral blood of adult DLBCL patients treated with tisagenlecleucel in a single institution. Samples were collected from 25 patients at 3 time points: before lymphocyte-depletion chemotherapy and on days 3 and 13 after CAR-T infusion. After infusion, all patients except 1 experienced CRS, and 13 required the administration of tocilizumab. A significant elevation in the plasma level of total plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1), which promotes the initial step of coagulopathy (mean, 22.5 ng/mL before lymphocyte-depletion and 41.0 on day 3, P = .02), was observed at the onset of CRS. Moreover, this suppressed fibrinolysis-induced relatively hypercoagulable state was gradually resolved after CRS remission with normalization of total PAI-1 to preinfusion levels without any organ damage (mean values of soluble fibrin: 3.16 µg/mL at baseline, 8.04 on day 3, and 9.16 on day 13, P < .01; and mean PAI-1: 25.1 ng/mL on day 13). In conclusion, a hypofibrinolytic and relatively hypercoagulable state concomitant with significant total PAI-1 elevation was observed at the onset of CRS even in DLBCL patients with mild CRS. Our results will facilitate understanding of CRS-related coagulopathy, and they emphasize the importance of monitoring sequential coagulation/fibrinolysis parameters during CAR-T therapy.
2. Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitor for Functional Mitral Regurgitation
Duk-Hyun Kang, Sung-Ji Park, Sung-Hee Shin, Geu-Ru Hong, Sahmin Lee, Min-Seok Kim, Sung-Cheol Yun, Jong-Min Song, Seung-Woo Park, Jae-Joong Kim Circulation. 2019 Mar 12;139(11):1354-1365. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.037077.
Background: The morbidity and mortality of patients with functional mitral regurgitation (MR) remain high, but no pharmacological therapy has been proven effective. The hypothesis of this study was that sacubitril/valsartan would be superior to valsartan alone in improving functional MR via dual inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system and neprilysin. Methods: In this double-blind trial, we randomly assigned 118 patients with heart failure with chronic functional MR secondary to left ventricular (LV) dysfunction to receive either sacubitril/valsartan or valsartan, in addition to standard medical therapy for heart failure. The primary end point was the change in effective regurgitant orifice area of functional MR from baseline to the 12-month follow-up. Secondary end points included changes in regurgitant volume, LV end-systolic volume, LV end-diastolic volume, and incomplete mitral leaflet closure area. Results: The decrease in effective regurgitant orifice area was significantly greater in the sacubitril/valsartan group than in the valsartan group (-0.058±0.095 versus -0.018±0.105 cm2; P=0.032) in an intention-to-treat analysis including 117 (99%) patients. Regurgitant volume was also significantly decreased in the sacubitril/valsartan group in comparison with the valsartan group (mean difference, -7.3 mL; 95% CI, -12.6 to -1.9; P=0.009). There were no significant between-group differences regarding the changes in incomplete mitral leaflet closure area and LV volumes, with the exception of LV end-diastolic volume index ( P=0.044). We noted no significant difference in the change of blood pressure between the treatment groups, and 7 patients (12%) in the sacubitril/valsartan group and 9 (16%) in the valsartan group had ≥1 serious adverse events ( P=0.54). Conclusions: Among patients with secondary functional MR, sacubitril/valsartan reduced MR to a greater extent than did valsartan. Our findings suggest that an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor might be considered for optimal medical therapy of patients with heart failure and functional MR. Clinical trial registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02687932.
3. Cemiplimab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized, controlled, double-blind phase 3 trial
Miranda Gogishvili, et al. Nat Med. 2022 Nov;28(11):2374-2380. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01977-y. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
First-line cemiplimab (anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)) monotherapy has previously shown significant improvement in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) and PD-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥50%. EMPOWER-Lung 3 ( NCT03409614 ), a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study, examined cemiplimab plus platinum-doublet chemotherapy as first-line treatment for aNSCLC, irrespective of PD-L1 expression or histology. In this study, 466 patients with stage III/IV aNSCLC without EGFR, ALK or ROS1 genomic tumor aberrations were randomized (2:1) to receive cemiplimab 350 mg (n = 312) or placebo (n = 154) every 3 weeks for up to 108 weeks in combination with four cycles of platinum-doublet chemotherapy (followed by pemetrexed maintenance as indicated). In total, 57.1% (266/466 patients) had non-squamous NSCLC, and 85.2% (397/466 patients) had stage IV disease. The primary endpoint was OS. The trial was stopped early per recommendation of the independent data monitoring committee, based on meeting preset OS efficacy criteria: median OS was 21.9 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 15.5-not evaluable) with cemiplimab plus chemotherapy versus 13.0 months (95% CI, 11.9-16.1) with placebo plus chemotherapy (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.53-0.93; P = 0.014). Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred with cemiplimab plus chemotherapy (43.6%, 136/312 patients) and placebo plus chemotherapy (31.4%, 48/153 patients). Cemiplimab is only the second anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agent to show efficacy in aNSCLC as both monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapy for both squamous and non-squamous histologies.