Maculatin 1.2

The interactions of the antimicrobial peptides aurein 1.2, citropin 1.1 and maculatin 1.1 with dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine (DMPC), dimyristoylphosphatidylglycerol (DMPG) and dimyristoylphosphatidylethanolamine (DMPE) were studied by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. The effects of these peptides on the thermotropic phase behavior of DMPC and DMPG are qualitatively similar and manifested by the suppression of the pretransition, and by peptide concentration-dependent decreases in the temperature, cooperativity and enthalpy of the gel/liquid-crystalline phase transition. However, at all peptide concentrations, anionic DMPG bilayers are more strongly perturbed than zwitterionic DMPC bilayers, consistent with membrane surface charge being an important aspect of the interactions of these peptides with phospholipids. However, at all peptide concentrations, the perturbation of the thermotropic phase behavior of zwitterionic DMPE bilayers is weak and discernable only when samples are exposed to high temperatures. FTIR spectroscopy indicates that these peptides are unstructured in aqueous solution and that they fold into alpha-helices when incorporated into lipid membranes. All three peptides undergo rapid and extensive H-D exchange when incorporated into D(2)O-hydrated phospholipid bilayers, suggesting that they are located in solvent-accessible environments, most probably in the polar/apolar interfacial regions of phospholipid bilayers. The perturbation of model lipid membranes by these peptides decreases in magnitude in the order maculatin 1.1>aurein 1.2>citropin 1.1, whereas the capacity to inhibit Acholeplasma laidlawii B growth decreases in the order maculatin 1.1>aurein 1.2 congruent with citropin 1.1. The higher efficacy of maculatin 1.1 in disrupting model and biological membranes can be rationalized by its larger size and higher net charge. However, despite its smaller size and lower net charge, aurein 1.2 is more disruptive of model lipid membranes than citropin 1.1 and exhibits comparable antimicrobial activity, probably because aurein 1.2 has a higher propensity for partitioning into phospholipid membranes.

The membrane interaction of peptides derived from maculatin 1.1 and caerin 1.1, with the sequence motif of N and C termini of maculatin 1.1, was compared in order to understand the role of these common sequence motifs, which encompass critical proline residues, on peptide secondary structure and on membrane binding and disruption in zwitterionic and anionic membranes. The peptides incorporated a single substitution with lysine or deletion of the central region to mimic the length of the antimicrobial peptides, citropin 1.1 and aurein 1.2. The impact of these changes in the sequence, length and physicochemical properties, on lytic activity and structure was assessed by dye-release from lipid vesicles and the change in the bilayer order as a function of membrane-bound peptide mass. All peptides adopted similar degrees of helical structure in both membrane systems. In addition, all peptide analogues were less active than either maculatin 1.1 or caerin 1.1 in dye release assays. The membrane binding was analyzed by dual polarization interferometry and the results showed that membrane binding was significantly affected by changes in the hydrophobic environment of Pro-15. Moreover, changes in the relative distribution of charge and hydrophobicity flanking Pro-15 also caused significant changes to the membrane order. Overall, the proline residue plays an important role in inducing a peptide structure that enhances the activity of these antimicrobial peptides.

In the present work we investigated the differential interactions of the antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) aurein 1.2 and maculatin 1.1 with a bilayer composed of a mixture of the lipids 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-(1'-rac-glycerol) (POPG) and 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (POPE). We carried out molecular dynamics (MD) simulations using a coarse-grained approach within the MARTINI force field. The POPE/POPG mixture was used as a simple model of a bacterial (prokaryotic cell) membrane. The results were compared with our previous findings for structures of 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (POPC), a representative lipid of mammalian cells. We started the simulations of the peptide-lipid system from two different initial conditions: peptides in water and peptides inside the hydrophobic core of the membrane, employing a pre-assembled lipid bilayer in both cases. Our results show similarities and differences regarding the molecular behavior of the peptides in POPE/POPG in comparison to their behavior in a POPC membrane. For instance, aurein 1.2 molecules can adopt similar pore-like structures on both POPG/POPE and POPC membranes, but the peptides are found deeper in the hydrophobic core in the former. Maculatin 1.1 molecules, in turn, achieve very similar structures in both kinds of bilayers: they have a strong tendency to form clusters and induce curvature. Therefore, the results of this study provide insight into the mechanisms of action of these two peptides in membrane leakage, which allows organisms to protect themselves against potentially harmful bacteria. Graphical Abstract Aurein pore structure (green) in a lipid bilayer composed by POPE (blue) and POPG (red) mixture. It is possible to see water beads (light blue) inside the pore.