Methyl 1H-pyrazolo(3,4-b)pyridine-5-carboxylate
Need Assistance?
  • US & Canada:
    +
  • UK: +

Methyl 1H-pyrazolo(3,4-b)pyridine-5-carboxylate

* Please kindly note that our products are not to be used for therapeutic purposes and cannot be sold to patients.

Category
Bicyclic Amino Acids
Catalog number
BAT-008586
CAS number
1196156-42-9
Molecular Formula
C8H7N3O2
Molecular Weight
177.16
IUPAC Name
methyl 1H-pyrazolo[3,4-b]pyridine-5-carboxylate
Synonyms
1H-Pyrazolo[3,4-b]pyridine-5-carboxylic acid methyl ester
InChI
InChI=1S/C8H7N3O2/c1-13-8(12)6-2-5-4-10-11-7(5)9-3-6/h2-4H,1H3,(H,9,10,11)
InChI Key
WAYSJYROSIMXRC-UHFFFAOYSA-N
Canonical SMILES
COC(=O)C1=CN=C2C(=C1)C=NN2
1. New pyrazolo[3,4-b]pyridones as selective A(1) adenosine receptor antagonists: synthesis, biological evaluation and molecular modelling studies
Paola Fossa, et al. Org Biomol Chem. 2005 Jun 21;3(12):2262-70. doi: 10.1039/b502831k. Epub 2005 May 19.
A series of ethyl 4-amino-1-(2-chloro-2-phenylethyl)-6-oxo-6,7-dihydro-1H-pyrazolo[3,4-b]pyridine-5-carboxylates () has been synthesized as potential A(1) adenosine receptor (A(1) AR) ligands. Binding affinities of the new compounds were determined for adenosine A(1), A(2A) and A(3) receptors. Compounds and showed good affinity (K(i)= 299 nM and 517 nM, respectively) and selectivity towards A(1) AR, whereas showed good affinity for A(2A) AR (K(i)= 290 nM), higher than towards A(1) AR (K(i)= 1000 nM). The only arylamino derivative of the series displayed high affinity (K(i)= 4.6 nM) and selectivity for A(3) AR. Molecular modelling and 3D-QSAR (CoMFA) studies carried out on the most active compounds gave further support to the pharmacological results.
2. 2,6,8-trisubstituted 1-deazapurines as adenosine receptor antagonists
Lisa C W Chang, Jacobien K von Frijtag Drabbe Künzel, Thea Mulder-Krieger, Joost Westerhout, Thomas Spangenberg, Johannes Brussee, Adriaan P Ijzerman J Med Chem. 2007 Feb 22;50(4):828-34. doi: 10.1021/jm0607956.
In this study we developed a refined pharmacophore model for antagonists of the human adenosine A1 receptor, based on features of known pyrimidine and purine derivatives. The adoption of these updated criteria assisted us in synthesizing a series of 1-deazapurines with consistently high affinity as inverse agonists for the adenosine A1 receptor. These 1-deazapurines (otherwise known as 3H-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridines) were substituted at their 2- and 6-positions, yielding a series with five of the derivatives displaying Ki values in the subnanomolar range. The most potent of these, compound 10 (LUF 5978), displayed an affinity of 0.55 nM at the human adenosine A1 receptor with >300-fold and 45-fold selectivity toward A2A and A3 receptors, respectively. Compound 14 (LUF 5981, Ki = 0.90 nM) appeared to have the best overall selectivity with respect to adenosine A2A (>200-fold) and A3 (700-fold) receptors.
3. Substituted pyrazolo[3,4-b]pyridines as potent A1 adenosine antagonists: synthesis, biological evaluation, and development of an A1 bovine receptor model
Tiziano Tuccinardi, et al. ChemMedChem. 2008 Jun;3(6):898-913. doi: 10.1002/cmdc.200700355.
Sixty-eight new substituted pyrazolo[3,4-b]pyridine derivatives were synthesized and tested for enriching a library of active A(1) adenosine receptor (AR) antagonists belonging to the same class. These compounds were also used as an external test set to check the reliability of a 3D QSAR model recently reported by us. To investigate the binding mode of pyrazolopyridine derivatives, a model of the bovine A(1)AR (bA(1)AR) was developed by a novel homology modeling approach and used to evaluate the main interactions of the ligands with the receptor through docking studies. Results suggest important interactions of the ligands mainly with L3.33(88), T3.36(91), Q3.37(92) and H6.52(251), in agreement with mutagenesis data. The racemic mixture of the most active compound was separated into the corresponding enantiomers which showed a bA(1)AR affinity in the nanomolar range, with the R enantiomer sevenfold more active than the S enantiomer, according to results derived from calculations on the receptor model. Analysis of the bovine/human A(1)AR affinity profile of ligands supported the hypothesis that such receptors should be characterized by a different size of their binding site, responsible for the different affinity of the antagonists.
Online Inquiry
Verification code
Inquiry Basket