Selepressin

The Publisher regrets that this article is an accidental duplication of an article that has already been published, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accpm.2019.10.009. The duplicate article has therefore been withdrawn. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdrawal.

Intestinal or mesenteric ischemia generally leads to inflammation and injury, potentially developing hypoxia, causing cell death and tissue necrosis. This in turn can lead to sepsis and shock. Conversely, following shock, the intestinal tract is a main organ to experience ischemic/reperfusion injury. Increased intestinal cell-membrane permeability through mesenteric ischemia provoking bacterial translocation and gut-barrier injury can lead to sepsis and multi-organ failure. Hypotension induced by systemic vasodilation and vascular leak in systemic inflammatory response syndrome and sepsis is countered by immediate fluid resuscitation and vasopressor administration, primarily norepinephrine (NE), with possible arginine vasopressin (AVP) supplementation, an agonist of vasopressin V1Aand V2receptors. Selepressin is a selective V1A-receptor agonist, avoiding potential V2receptor-associated adverse effects. Selepressin, non-selective AVP, and NE effects on mesenteric blood flow (MBF) and gastric mucosa perfusion (GMP) were compared in control rabbits and a lipopolysaccharide-induced, fluid-resuscitated rabbit endotoxemia model. AVP induced a pronounced decrease in MBF and GMP in non-endotoxemic and endotoxemic rabbits, whereas the reduction after selepressin treatment was significantly less for both indicators in the endotoxemic animals. By contrast, NE increased the MBF and did not affect GMP in both groups. Selepressin and AVP induced a pronounced dose-dependent increase in mesenteric vascular resistance in non-endotoxemic and endotoxemic rabbits, tending to be less in endotoxemic animals, whereas a minor increase in both groups was observed with NE. Therefore, in this safety study, the risk for mesenteric ischemia on selepressin treatment was not inferior to AVP, being less in endotoxemic than in non-endotoxemic animals.

Importance:Effective therapies for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are needed, and clinical trial data have demonstrated that low-dose dexamethasone reduced mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 who required respiratory support.Objective:To estimate the association between administration of corticosteroids compared with usual care or placebo and 28-day all-cause mortality.Design, setting, and participants:Prospective meta-analysis that pooled data from 7 randomized clinical trials that evaluated the efficacy of corticosteroids in 1703 critically ill patients with COVID-19. The trials were conducted in 12 countries from February 26, 2020, to June 9, 2020, and the date of final follow-up was July 6, 2020. Pooled data were aggregated from the individual trials, overall, and in predefined subgroups. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. Inconsistency among trial results was assessed using the I2 statistic. The primary analysis was an inverse variance-weighted fixed-effect meta-analysis of overall mortality, with the association between the intervention and mortality quantified using odds ratios (ORs). Random-effects meta-analyses also were conducted (with the Paule-Mandel estimate of heterogeneity and the Hartung-Knapp adjustment) and an inverse variance-weighted fixed-effect analysis using risk ratios.Exposures:Patients had been randomized to receive systemic dexamethasone, hydrocortisone, or methylprednisolone (678 patients) or to receive usual care or placebo (1025 patients).Main outcomes and measures:The primary outcome measure was all-cause mortality at 28 days after randomization. A secondary outcome was investigator-defined serious adverse events.Results:A total of 1703 patients (median age, 60 years [interquartile range, 52-68 years]; 488 [29%] women) were included in the analysis. Risk of bias was assessed as "low" for 6 of the 7 mortality results and as "some concerns" in 1 trial because of the randomization method. Five trials reported mortality at 28 days, 1 trial at 21 days, and 1 trial at 30 days. There were 222 deaths among the 678 patients randomized to corticosteroids and 425 deaths among the 1025 patients randomized to usual care or placebo (summary OR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.53-0.82]; P < .001 based on a fixed-effect meta-analysis). There was little inconsistency between the trial results (I2 = 15.6%; P = .31 for heterogeneity) and the summary OR was 0.70 (95% CI, 0.48-1.01; P = .053) based on the random-effects meta-analysis. The fixed-effect summary OR for the association with mortality was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.50-0.82; P < .001) for dexamethasone compared with usual care or placebo (3 trials, 1282 patients, and 527 deaths), the OR was 0.69 (95% CI, 0.43-1.12; P = .13) for hydrocortisone (3 trials, 374 patients, and 94 deaths), and the OR was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.29-2.87; P = .87) for methylprednisolone (1 trial, 47 patients, and 26 deaths). Among the 6 trials that reported serious adverse events, 64 events occurred among 354 patients randomized to corticosteroids and 80 events occurred among 342 patients randomized to usual care or placebo.Conclusions and relevance:In this prospective meta-analysis of clinical trials of critically ill patients with COVID-19, administration of systemic corticosteroids, compared with usual care or placebo, was associated with lower 28-day all-cause mortality.

Background:Vasopressors are administered to critically ill patients with vasodilatory shock not responsive to volume resuscitation, and less often in cardiogenic shock, and hypovolemic shock.Objectives:The objectives are to review safety and efficacy of vasopressors, pathophysiology, agents that decrease vasopressor dose, predictive biomarkers, β1-blockers, and directions for research.Methods:The quality of evidence was evaluated using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE).Results:Vasopressors bind adrenergic: α1, α2, β1, β2; vasopressin: AVPR1a, AVPR1B, AVPR2; angiotensin II: AG1, AG2; and dopamine: DA1, DA2 receptors inducing vasoconstriction. Vasopressor choice and dose vary because of patients and physician practice. Adverse effects include excessive vasoconstriction, organ ischemia, hyperglycemia, hyperlactatemia, tachycardia, and tachyarrhythmias. No randomized controlled trials of vasopressors showed a significant difference in 28-day mortality rate. Norepinephrine is the first-choice vasopressor in vasodilatory shock after adequate volume resuscitation. Some strategies that decrease norepinephrine dose (vasopressin, angiotensin II) have not decreased 28-day mortality while corticosteroids have decreased 28-day mortality significantly in some (two large trials) but not all trials. In norepinephrine-refractory patients, vasopressin or epinephrine may be added. A new vasopressor, angiotensin II, may be useful in profoundly hypotensive patients. Dobutamine may be added because vasopressors may decrease ventricular contractility. Dopamine is recommended only in bradycardic patients. There are potent vasopressors with limited evidence (e.g. methylene blue, metaraminol) and novel vasopressors in development (selepressin).Conclusions:Norepinephrine is first choice followed by vasopressin or epinephrine. Angiotensin II and dopamine have limited indications. In future, predictive biomarkers may guide vasopressor selection and novel vasopressors may emerge.